Autism Waiting Time Statistics - Quarter 1 (April to June) 2018-19 to Quarter 4 (January to March) 2019-20

This data has been collected and presented as part of a programme of work, led by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England and NHS Improvement, to improve health and wellbeing outcomes for autistic children, young people and adults. 

The data included in this report are based on the following National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance: 

NICE clinical audit support tools covering adults and children – NICE Guidance on Autism spectrum disorder in adults: diagnosis and management (CG142); 

NICE Guideline on Autism spectrum disorder in under 19s: recognition, referral and diagnosis (CG128);  

NICE Quality Standard QS51 for autism. 

NICE recommend that people who are referred to a professional or team who specialise in diagnosing autism should have an assessment started within 13 weeks of their referral. Data from the Mental Health Services Dataset (v3.0) enables us to measure whether this waiting time recommendation is being met. 

MHSDS is a patient level, output based, secondary uses data set which aims to deliver robust, comprehensive, nationally consistent and comparable information for children, young people and adults who are in contact with mental health services, including autism services.  People who receive autism spectrum disorder services or who are thought to have an autism spectrum disorder are within the scope of the MHSDS. 

Changes in Version 3.0 of the MHSDS, introduced on 1 April 2018, include enhanced data collection in support of timely recording of diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.  From 1 April 2018 providers of mental health, learning disabilities and autism spectrum disorder services must start submitting data related to autism patients, as two new options are available for the primary reason for referral as follows: 

25 - Suspected Autism Spectrum Disorder 

26 - Diagnosed Autism Spectrum Disorder

These statistics are classified as ‘Experimental’ and should be used with caution. Experimental statistics are new official statistics undergoing evaluation. They are published in order to involve users and stakeholders in their development and as a means to build in quality at an early stage. Learn more about Experimental statistics.

MHSDS v4.0 came into effect on 1 April 2019 though there has been no change in how autism data is collected and reported. However, this version of the dataset is now submitted by providers on a new data submission platform which is likely to impact further in future reporting, due to known issues providers had in submitting data to the platform in April to June 2019. Further details about these issues can be found in the data quality reports that accompany the Mental Health Services statistics.

MHSDS v4.1 is the latest version of the dataset, data collection for v4.1 started 1 April 2020, replacing the previous v4.0 collection.

Development of MHSDS v5.0 commenced earlier this year for an April 2021 go-live. However in view of the current pressures on the system, at both a local and national level, a decision has been taken to delay the go-live for v5.0 until 1 October 2021.

This dimension covers the degree to which the statistical product meets user need in both coverage and content. 

Experimental Statistics 

The statistics in this publication are marked as  ‘Experimental’  and may be subject to further change as we develop these statistics. Experimental statistics are a subset of newly developed or innovative official statistics undergoing evaluation. The classification of Experimental Statistics is in keeping with the UK Statistics Authority’s Code of Practice. The ‘Value’ pillar in the Code of Practice advocates that as suppliers of information it is important that we continue “improving existing statistics and creating new ones through discussion and collaboration with stakeholders”. 

Accordingly, these are published to involve users and stakeholders in their development, and to build quality at an early stage. It is believed that these statistics have immediate value to users; however, those users need to be aware of the statistics’ limitations and related cautions around their use, which are set out in this document, to make informed and qualified use of them. The methods used are still subject to regular evaluation and future modification. 

Learn more about the UK Statistics Authority Code of Practice for Statistics.

Coverage in terms of this publication is related to whether all relevant providers are submitting data. 

All providers of NHS-funded specialist mental health, learning disability and autism services should submit to the MHSDS. At present only a small number of independent sector providers are making submissions, and this has an impact on coverage. 

Generally, the number of service providers who have provided an MHSDS submission is monitored and reported in the MHSDS Submission Update which shows the number of providers submitting data each month and the number of records by provider and by table. Learn more about these reports.

The submission report shows those providers providing a submission compared to those NHS Digital currently consider to be in scope for the collection. The providers considered in scope for the MHSDS have been determined through intelligence gathered from other national datasets and from information provided by national and local stakeholders. This list is subject to revision based on new intelligence received. 

In order to be counted as providing a submission, only two of the data tables are mandated to flow each time any activity is reported within the MHSDS (MHS001; patient demographics and MHS002; GP registration). Completion of the remaining tables is only required when activity has occurred that is captured within these tables. 

All providers of autism services are required to submit data if they provide this care.  Diagnosis takes place across mental health, community, and paediatric services and so it is difficult to determine an exact number of organisations that should be submitting autism data to the MHSDS.  Work to determine which provider organisations should be submitting data for autism patients is ongoing, using other sources of information (e.g. National Autistic Society directory) as well as contacting providers directly. This will help build a clearer picture for future reporting. 

As part of the MHSDS monthly statistics publication, national and organisation level data quality measures are shown that validate a selection of key data items by provider. These show the proportion of records as counts and percentages which have ‘valid’, ‘other’, ‘default’, ‘invalid’ and ‘missing’ values for key elements of the dataset, such as Primary Reason for Referral. These data quality measures need to be considered when interpreting these autism statistics.

Completeness of submissions varies month-to-month by provider. Local knowledge may be required to assess the completeness of a submission, based on information about local caseload and services. This release provides detailed information about activity, which providers and commissioners are encouraged to review to ensure that submissions accurately reflect the local situation. 

We have been able to group submitters into five categories: 

1. Non-submitters for anything autism related but do submit to MHSDS for other types of patients 
2. Partial submitters that submit autism referrals but nothing else 
3. Partial submitters that do not submit a primary reason for referral but do submit autism diagnoses (mostly with care contact dates) 
4. Irregular submitters that do not submit data each month (this can include full and partial submissions) 
5. Good submitters that submit autism referrals, care contact dates and diagnosis information each month 

Providers have been contacted in relation to non-submission, partial completion, and low submission. Responses were summarised as follows: 

• Confirmation that they do not provide autism services 
• Uncertainty around how to submit the data and advice has now been given, signposting to the autism guidance
• That they do not have the relevant IT systems in place to provide all the relevant information for submission especially around coded diagnosis. For some providers, new systems are being introduced
• Some providers assess patients as having suspected autism but seems there is confusion around recording this as a referral or onward referral especially where providers do not treat or formally diagnose patients for autism
• Some providers are not able to record autism-specific activity in their local systems and still using broader category of ‘Neurodevelopment conditions’
• Community hospitals have submitted data to MHSDS for autism but not sure if they should. This is where patients are presented to them with more than one health condition including autism with some of the patient pathway recorded in the Community Services Dataset. 

As a result of the above findings, NHS Digital plan to: 

• Review the current autism guidance for data submitters
• Wait to see whether certain providers submissions improve following advice and guidance or following the introduction of improved data collection and IT systems
• Produce an in-scope list of those organisations that provide autism services, so coverage and completeness are better understood 

Reporting requirements that cannot be yet met due to very low completeness are: 

Post-diagnostic outcomes which require completion of the Onward Referral table and an increased number of submissions for referrals for ‘diagnosed autism’ (code 26). 

Robust waiting times between referral and first care contact/appointment - current waiting times are based on length of time between the referral date and earliest care contact date submitted for each patient. This could be an initial assessment/triage appointment or a first treatment appointment. First treatment appointments could be a more robust measure for stopping the clock on waiting times but there is very low completion of the Consultation Type field which indicates whether the first appointment was an initial assessment/triage or a first treatment appointment. Therefore, all care contact dates have been used to stop the clock on waiting times in the forward model.

In terms of diagnoses information, different clinical classifications have been used across providers.  Some providers have submitted International Classification of Diseases Version 10 codes (ICD-10), some READ codes and some SNOMED codes. This analysis captures all classifications. For ICD-10 submitters, all F84.0 codes apart from F84.2 and F84.4 have been included which are all codes for autistic spectrum disorder, all F88 codes have also been included, and all F89 codes have also been included. Read the list of all ICD-10 codes.

For SNOMED, the following concept IDs have been used:

From 1 April 2020, SNOMED completion became mandatory which will help to standardise coding and reliability.

This dimension covers, with respect to the statistics, their proximity between an estimate and the unknown true value.

The MHSDS is a rich, person-level dataset that records packages of care received by individuals in contact with mental health secondary care services. NHS Digital provides different reports at different stages in the data flow to ensure that the submitted data reflects the services that have been provided. 

At the point of submission, providers receive immediate feedback on the quality of their submission through a validation file. This file includes record-level reports of any submission errors, giving the data providers detailed information of which records produced which errors. Providers should then, where possible, use these errors and warnings to rectify these issues before resubmitting their data via a refresh submission up to one month later. 

A variety of data quality checks are run as part of the validation and load process for monthly data, prior to production of any monthly release. Where there are concerns about data quality, providers are contacted directly so that any issues with local data extraction processes can be addressed for a future submission. These checks are currently limited to key elements of the dataset. Additional checks may be developed as part of future submissions. 

Initial reporting may contain data quality issues due to inaccurate content being submitted. While steps are to be taken to reduce data quality issues in future reporting, some of these issues affect the current outputs. However, as data providers become accustomed to additional data quality requirements and further developed autism guidance over the coming reporting periods, the effect on outputs should lessen.

Whilst local systems may be continuously updated, the MHSDS submission process currently provides two opportunities for data relevant to each month to be submitted. The primary submission window opens for around one month immediately following the end of the reporting month and the refresh submission window is open in the subsequent month. This means that the timeliness of recording all relevant activity on local systems has an impact on the completeness of the MHSDS submission. 

Providers should use the submission summary reports produced at the point of submission to ensure that all relevant data has been included. Statistics published in this report are calculated using data taken after the refresh submission window has closed. 

Timeliness refers to the time gap between publication and the reporting period. Punctuality refers to the gap between planned and actual publication dates.

The analysis in this report is based on data submitted by providers during both the primary and refresh submission windows. Any data which are re-submitted by a provider will be used in place of an earlier submission only within the submission window. 

The requirements for new autism submissions are more widely understood by providers and we can continue the early evaluation of autism data with users and stakeholders. This will allow these new experimental statistics to develop and improve and eventually become official statistics.

From April 2020 NHS Digital implemented a multiple submission window model for MHSDS which enabled the resubmission of data throughout the financial year. Following the implementation of the multiple submission window model providers were optionally able to submit/resubmit data for each month of 2019-20 from April 2020 to 21 May 2020. Please be aware of the potential impact of the multiple submission window model on previously published data and use these statistics with reference to it.

Learn more about submission deadlines for MHSDS.

The Autism Waiting Time Statistics publications will be published on pre-announced dates and are therefore deemed to be punctual.

Accessibility is the ease with which users can access the data, also reflecting the format in which the data are available and the availability of supporting information. Clarity refers to the quality and sufficiency of the metadata, illustrations, and accompanying advice.

The format of this publication aims to meet user needs in the provision of comprehensive web based supplementary information, accompanying comma separated variable (CSV) data files and a visual analytics report.

This report is made freely accessible via the NHS Digital website. The data files are also available on the data.gov website.

Re-use of our data is subject to conditions.

The data is presented as a set of csv files. Definitions will be developed, and further guidance provided in future editions of this publication series. 

Full details of the way that MHSDS returns are processed, which will be of use to analysts and other users of these data, are provided in the MHSDS User Guidance, 

Coherence is the degree to which data which have been derived from different sources or methods but refer to the same topic are similar. Comparability is the degree to which data can be compared over time and domain.

Prior to 1 April 2018 (or in MHSDS v2.0), autism was included in the wider ‘code 24’ for neurodevelopmental conditions option for primary reason for referral. The changes in v3.0 allow for autism referrals to be separately identified to aid analysis through the introduction of codes 25 and 26 for ‘suspected autism’ and ‘diagnosed autism’ respectively. 

Prior to publication, NHS Digital did some scoping work to check how best to report on these new measures. We found that data could be presented via two methods: 

The ‘forward model’ approach – which captures all suspected autism referrals (code 25) within a reporting period and then we search later periods of data to check whether those patients have had a first appointment/care contact.

The ‘reverse model’ approach – which captures all new autism diagnoses within a reporting period and then we search earlier periods of data to check when those patients were referred to calculate the waiting time from referral to diagnosis.

Diagnosis and treatment of autism can happen in different settings, such as primary, secondary, and tertiary care. There is not a single dataset that collects information from all these settings to help with a more comprehensive picture of all autistic patients or autism prevalence. 

Patients in MHSDS can have a recorded diagnosis of autism in mental health secondary care services. These statistics do not include people diagnosed with mental health conditions who are only in contact with primary care services, such as their General Practitioner (GP). Therefore, the autism data presented in this release only presents a partial picture of the number of people with an autism diagnoses from those providers that have submitted data. 

Our other data collection, called Assuring Transformation, can provide figures for patients in specialist inpatient care who have autism and can be broken down by age and gender. As this dataset only holds information on inpatients, this would not show the whole population and would also provide a partial picture. 

Our most recent adult survey (from 2014) is the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS) series, which covers the general population and gives the latest and best estimate of autism prevalence by age and gender. See Chapter 6 of the survey series pages.

The APMS series is England's key data source for the prevalence of treated and untreated mental disorders in the general population. APMS is designed to provide an estimate of the prevalence of mental disorders in the population regardless of whether these have been diagnosed by a clinician. As such these numbers represent people who have been assessed rather than those who have received a diagnosis. 

Our most recent child survey (from 2017) is the Mental Health Survey for Children and Young People, which covers the general population and gives the latest and best estimate of autism prevalence. This series is England's key data source for the prevalence of treated and untreated mental disorders. It is designed to provide an estimate of the prevalence of mental disorders in the population regardless of whether these have been diagnosed by a clinician. As such these numbers represent children who have been assessed rather than those who have received a diagnosis. 

The link to this survey report can be found here.

This dimension describes the extent to which different aspects of quality are balanced against each other. 

This publication presents new autism waiting times measures using data in the MHSDS (from April 2018) following the publication of new autism submission requirements and guidance earlier in 2019. 

Because this is relatively new, some providers will continue to experience issues making a comprehensive submission within the permitted timescales.  We expect a more complete and accurate picture to emerge over time. This analysis presents an early view and is subject to caveats both in terms of provider coverage and completeness of the submission and the limits of the data that has been provided around pathways into services to support monitoring of waiting times. 

The format of this publication has been determined to enable timely reporting of key initial measures while adjusting the scope of analysis to be achievable within NHS Digital resources and production time. The scope of analysis will be expanded in future editions of the publication series to increase the usefulness and usability of these statistics for different users. By publishing an increasing range of clearly defined measures in a timely fashion we hope to support discussions between providers and commissioners about caseload and activity and promote a virtuous cycle of improving data quality through use. 

The development of these autism statistics is expected to become a key driver in helping achieve better outcomes for patients. These new reports provide autism service providers, commissioners and other stakeholders with timely information about activity. 

This publication meets initial user needs in terms of reporting on the number of patients referred for suspected autism with associated waiting times, subject to a number of caveats around coverage and completion. 

Therefore, reporting is currently shaped by the coverage and completeness of the data, but as data quality improves these reports will change to present more information. 

NHS Digital is keen to gain a better understanding of the users of this publication and of their needs.

Feedback is very welcome by emailing [email protected] .

Alternatively, you can call our Contact Centre on 0300 303 5678, or write to NHS Digital, Community and Mental Health Team, 7 and 8 Wellington Place, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS1 4AP.

This dimension describes the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of the statistical output. 

As a 'secondary uses' data set, the MHSDS does not require the collection of new data items by autism service providers. It re-uses existing clinical and operational data for purposes other than direct patient care. 

Providers are not required to submit data held only on paper records as no provision has been made in the MHSDS for the cost of transcribing these records to an electronic format. 

Only two of the data tables are mandated to flow each time any activity is reported within the MHSDS (MHS001; patient demographics and MHS002; GP registration), completion of the remaining tables is only required when activity has occurred that is captured within these tables.

The procedures and policy used to ensure sound confidentiality, security and transparent practices. 

In order to prevent disclosure of identities or information about service users, all figures except England totals are rounded to the nearest five. England figures are unrounded and unsuppressed. All figures between 0 and 4 and all percentages calculated from values between 0 and 4 are suppressed (*). Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.

All publications are subject to a standard NHS Digital risk assessment prior to issue. Disclosure control is implemented where deemed necessary. 

Please see links below to relevant NHS Digital policies:

Statistical Governance policies

Freedom of Information process

A Guide to Confidentiality in Health and Social Care

Privacy and Data Protection

Author: Community and Mental Health team, NHS Digital 

Responsible Statistician: Paul Jennings 

This publication may be requested in large print or other formats. 

Published by NHS Digital, part of the Government Statistical Service Copyright © 2020 Health and Social Care Information Centre. 

The Health and Social Care Information Centre is a non-departmental body created by statute, also known as NHS Digital. 

 You may re-use this publication (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government licence v3.0. 

or, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU; or email: [email protected]