Skip to main content
National Statistics
Publication, Part of

Adult Social Care Activity and Finance Report, England - 2018-19 [PAS]

National statistics, Official statistics
Publication Date:
Geographic Coverage:
Geographical Granularity:
Country, Regions, Councils with Adult Social Services Responsibilities (CASSRs), Local Authorities
Date Range:
01 Apr 2018 to 31 Mar 2019

A note regarding these statistics

This is the third year in which the adult social care activity and finance data have been brought together in an official statistics report.

Activity data is sourced from the Short and Long Term (SALT) return, while finance data is taken from the Adult Social Care Finance Return (ASC-FR). In previous years the report included analysis of the Deferred Payments Agreement (DPA) collection. This is now a separate publication which is due for release later in the year and can be found here:

This report presents the main themes only, based on mandatory data, at England level. Regional and local analysis can be found in the publication reference tables. The full data collected including voluntary elements of the data are available in both Excel and CSV format from

Further information around the data collections can also be found here:

NHS Digital plans to continue to develop and release user friendly outputs relating to this data.

Adult social care activity provided or arranged by local authorities covers a wide range of services including long term and short-term care, plus support to carers. Clients may take a variety of different pathways through the system, according to their needs.

This report will look in detail at the breakdown of expenditure by local authorities on adult social care, and the activity that is provided or arranged by the local authorities. As such, it does not cover adult social care activity and expenditure that is provided or funded elsewhere, for example, if the care is arranged and funded by the client without any involvement from the local authority.

While the two collections have been designed to be as complementary as possible, there are some differences in how data is categorised and so direct comparisons between the two sources should be made with care.

It is possible however, to consider broader similarities and differences in the trends shown in the data. For more information see the “How can the data be used?” section.

Where there are differences in the definitions used between the collections these will be clearly pointed out in this document, and you can also find further information in the Equalities and Classifications standard (EQ-CL)[1] which sets out the definitions for each of the collections, as well as within the guidance documents for each collection[2]. If you require any further information about how the data used in this report can be compared, please contact us at

The finance elements of this report focus primarily on gross current expenditure. This is defined as the total expenditure less capital charges, and less all income except for client contributions.

Finance data within the commentary of this report is rounded to the nearest million. Figures in billions are reported to one decimal place.

Activity data within the commentary of this report is rounded to the nearest five.

Percentages are rounded to one decimal place.

All data is collected from Councils with Adult Social Services Responsibilities (CASSRs) in England, however for ease of reading CASSRs will be referred to as local authorities throughout this report.

Next Release

This is an annual publication and the next release with 2019-20 data is planned for autumn 2020.

How can the data be used?

How can the data be used?

Data quality issues to note

For the 2018-19 collections NHS Digital used inbuilt validation checks within the data templates and post-submission data quality reports for each collection to identify logical inconsistencies in the data, and where the data submitted is an outlier against either local and national data or against submissions from previous years. Local authorities could then review and resubmit data ahead of the deadline or provide explanations for any identified issues.

Both the SALT and ASC-FR data returns contain complex elements and this, combined with the aggregate nature of the collections, means that some data quality issues are not always immediately apparent. Furthermore, the annual nature of the collections means that any issues with the submitted data can sometimes take a while to be identified and worked through with local authorities.

Through the respective collection Working Groups, NHS Digital work with local authorities and other stakeholders to continually develop the data template and the accompanying guidance documents to improve clarity and ease of completion. A DHSC project to convert the current aggregate return for social care activity to client level is currently underway. The envisaged benefits are increased value from the data collected, both through wider and more flexible availability of social care data together with the health links; a simpler return leading to reduced burden; and greater flexibility for future developments than aggregate returns such as SALT allow. DHSC and NHS Digital have engaged with all parts of the system, including all system suppliers, LGA, ADASS, NHS England and a range of individual LAs. Further information is available here

Whilst the quality of data submitted in the two returns – and SALT in particular – has improved in recent years, users should be aware of the following specific data quality points to note when reading this report:

  • Limitations with case management systems for reporting of some data items, particularly around full cost clients.
  • Several local authorities have mentioned difficulties obtaining and/or quality assuring data from third party organisations such as mental health or carer data.
  • Allocating expenditure by Primary Support Reason (PSR) in the ASC-FR can be challenging as many finance systems are not configured to collect this data.
  • The allocation of Better Care Fund (BCF) and improved Better Care Fund (iBCF) in the ASC-FR has improved in 2018-19 compared to previous years, so care should be taken when comparing to historic data.

Throughout the report we will identify data quality issues where appropriate to aid user interpretation. Further detail on the data quality of both collections can be found in the accompanying data quality summary.


Last edited: 17 October 2019 12:01 pm