In late 2017 the size and nature of the mental health workforce became a priority area following the publication of the mental health workforce plan for England, and a number of exchanges in Parliament and via social media. Following this attention in late 2017, the head of regulation at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) instructed NHS Digital to develop statistics on the mental health workforce.
Following the letter from the ONS, NHS Digital produced information as part of the January 2018 workforce statistics release which presented 3 ways to count the mental health workforce as well as a widest measure which included anyone in any of the 3 categories.
There was no attempt at that time to determine what an optimal definition might be or present any single number for the mental health workforce – simply to illustrate that there are multiple ways in which this workforce can be counted.
In June 2018, the Workforce Information Review Group (WIRG) agreed the benefit of developing a single definition.
A sub-group of WIRG, comprising representation from Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), NHS Digital, NHS England, Health Education England, NHS Improvement and mental health trusts, was established to undertake this task with a two-stage approach:
First, the development of a single definition using the existing data standards - meaning those data fields and lists of values already present on the National Workforce Data Set (NWD) and available to NHS Digital and others via the ESR.
Second, to consider whether this definition adequately captured the mental health workforce, or whether further development of the data standards would be necessary.
The sub-group reached agreement in December 2018, with subsequent confirmation from each represented body, that the definition using the existing data standards be on the following basis:
- The two fields ‘Occupation Code’ and 'Area of Work' define the mental health workforce, and these two fields are the only determinants of the definition. The employing organisation type is not taken into account.
- Records are included if the value of either of these two fields suggests mental health provision.
- Codes pertaining to learning disability are included in the definition, whilst recognising that the underlying data enables such staff to be separately identified if necessary.
- Codes that might potentially include staff delivering at least some provision of mental health services, but clearly a significant amount of non-mental health provision, are excluded – though a narrative should be drawn up to explain this.
- It is acknowledged that for some specific purposes, different definitions may be considered to be more appropriate, but this should be explicit in their presentation.