Skip to main content

Publication, Part of

Psychological Therapies: reports on the use of IAPT services, England - December 2020 Final including a report on the IAPT Employment Advisers pilot and Quarter 3 2020-21 data

Official statistics, Experimental statistics

Data resubmission

Please note that this publication was updated on 16th December 2021 to include revised data for some providers. This is following a one off resubmission exercise that took place in August 2021 and covered the data period September 2020 to May 2021 inclusive.

Please note that due to processing errors, the Quarterly Activity Data File and accompanying interactive dashboard were not included in the reissued data. The updated quarterly dashboard was published on 21 February 2022.

16 December 2021 09:30 AM

Page contents


Outcomes in IAPT are measured in terms of three measures:

  • recovery,
  • reliable improvement,
  • and reliable recovery.


Recovery in IAPT is measured in terms of ‘caseness’ – a term which means a referral has severe enough symptoms of anxiety or depression to be regarded as a clinical case. A referral has moved to recovery if they were defined as a clinical case at the start of their treatment (‘at caseness’) and not as a clinical case at the end of their treatment, measured by scores from questionnaires tailored to their specific condition.

The Government target is that 50% of eligible referrals to IAPT services should move to recovery.4

51.6% of eligible referrals moved to recovery

Calculating Recovery rates

In December 2020, the calculation to calculate the recovery rate is performed as below:


Count_Recovery / (Count_FinishedCourseTreatment - Count_NotAtCaseness) * 100


23,291 / ( 48,111 - 2,957) * 100 = 51.6%

Sub-national recovery rates are published in the Monthly Activity Data File as column ‘Percentage_Recovery’.

Reliable improvement

A referral has shown reliable improvement if there is a significant improvement in their condition following a course of treatment, measured by the difference between their first and last scores on questionnaires tailored to their specific condition.

67.7% of referrals finishing a course of treatment showed reliable improvement

Calculating improvement rates

In December 2020, the calculation is performed as below:


Count_Improvement / Count_FinishedCourseTreatment *100


32,597 / 48,331 * 100 = 67.4%


Sub-national reliable improvement rates are published in the Monthly Activity Data File as column ‘Percentage_Improvement’.

Reliable recovery

A referral has reliably recovered if they meet the criteria for both the recovery and reliable improvement measures. That is, they have moved from being a clinical case at the start of treatment to not being a clinical case at the end of treatment, and there has also been a significant improvement in their condition.

48.8% of referrals reliably recovered

Calculating reliable recovery rates

In December 2020, this calculation is performed as follows:


Count_ReliableRecovery / (Count_FinishedCourseTreatment - Count_NotAtCaseness) * 100


22,301 / (48,111 - 2957) * 100 = 47.2%

Sub-national reliable recovery rates are published in the Monthly Activity Data File as column ‘Percentage_ReliableRecovery’.

The chart below compares recovery, reliable improvement, and reliable recovery rates across a period of twelve months.

Each quarter, more detailed data are published about recovery, reliable improvement and reliable recovery. The most recent quarterly data, Quarter 3 2020/21, can be found at:

For an explanation of the terms used and further information about how measures are calculated in IAPT see the 'Guide to IAPT data and publications' at



4 See p16-17 of The Mandate: A mandate from the Government to NHS England: April 2015 to March 2016, available at:

Last edited: 21 February 2022 8:02 am