Formal reviews and assessments
A formal review or assessment includes a Care Programme Approach (CPA) review meeting, a treatment planning meeting, a multi-disciplinary team meeting, a Care (Education) and Treatment Review (C(E)TR) meeting.
Information about the Care and Treatment Review policy is available. Information about the Care, (Education) and Treatment Review policy is available.
A Care Programme Approach (CPA) review is a formal review which is used for people either who have been sectioned under the Mental Health Act (which means they are automatically reviewed under this approach) or it is a review used for people who haven’t been sectioned but have significant mental health needs, or complex needs which require a high level of support. This also means that the person will have a care co-ordinator who will have regular contact with the person and who will organise CPA reviews. Under this approach a review usually takes place every 6 months, although there is no mandated frequency, simply a requirement that a review is undertaken on a regular basis.
Usually a CPA review will last about an hour and is led by the Responsible Clinician (RC) who oversees the person’s care, the exception to this is in specialised commissioning where they structure a CPA using ‘my shared pathway’ and the person chairs their own CPA review. This membership of the review is usually the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) who work with the person so are likely to be for instance physiotherapists, occupational therapists and nursing staff, and the person is invited to attend the meeting which is usually organised by the provider.
With a C(E)TR, whilst the focus is still very much on the person it is not chaired by the RC, it is instead organised and chaired by the commissioner who is responsible either for placing the person in patient care, or who is the responsible commissioner covering the geographical locality where the person lives, and will often be funding part or all of their care package. At a C(E)TR there is also the addition of external experts – clinical expert and expert by experience – who bring additional external challenge to the review. Unlike the CPA process a C(E)TR does not focus on using reports drafted by the MDT to shape the review. Instead, there is an opportunity to access all records relevant to the person and their review to fully understand the person and their needs and identify blockages to moving on with their life. It also lasts for up to a day to ensure that full consideration can be given to the person’s needs and allow for time to be spent with the person as well as their carer’s and family.
Formal reviews and care (education) and treatment reviews
A C(E)TR is itself a formal review meeting and the date of the most recent C(E)TR (Q29) could be the same as the date of the most recent formal review or assessment (Q38). However, if the patient has had another review meeting (such as a CPA review) since their latest C(E)TR then the date of this review meeting should be reported in Q38. Ward round would not fall within this remit, as whilst it is a review it is not a formal overarching review with the depth of either CPA or C(E)TR.
The frequency of C(E)TRs is dependent on the age of the patient and what type of hospital setting they are a patient in. Further information about CTRs and C(E)TRs are available.
Details of patient's care plans (Q42)
The patient’s care plan refers to their care plan in accordance with their Care Programme Approach (CPA) review. Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews should inform the CPA review, but the outcome of the patient’s most recent C(E)TR can differ from the patient’s care plan (for example if a CPA review makes a decision someone is ready for discharge and the most recent CTR had an outcome of ‘Not ready for discharge - still needs to be in hospital bed for care and treatment’).
It is important that all the information relating to a patient is kept up to date in Assuring Transformation. If the details of a patient’s care plan (Q42a) differs from, or appears to contradict, the entry under Q30 (Outcome of most recent CTR), check that Q29 (Date of most recent CTR), Q30 (Outcome of most recent CTR) and Q38 (Date of most recent formal review) are up to date.
Further care (education) and treatment reviews guidance is available.