We have detected that you are using Internet Explorer to visit this website. Internet Explorer is now being phased out by Microsoft. As a result, NHS Digital no longer supports any version of Internet Explorer for our web-based products, as it involves considerable extra effort and expense, which cannot be justified from public funds. Some features on this site will not work. You should use a modern browser such as Edge, Chrome, Firefox, or Safari. If you have difficulty installing or accessing a different browser, contact your IT support team.
Quality and Outcomes Framework - 2005-06, Exception reportingOfficial statistics
- Publication Date:
- 28 Feb 2007
- Geographic Coverage:
- Geographical Granularity:
- GP practices, Dental practices, Pharmacies and clinics, Regions, Clinical Commissioning Groups, Country, Strategic Health Authorities, Primary Care Organisations, Clinical Commissioning Regions, Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships
- Date Range:
- 01 Apr 2005 to 31 Mar 2006
The QOF includes the concept of exception reporting. This has been introduced to allow practices to pursue the quality improvement agenda and not be penalised, where, for example, patients do not attend for review, or where a medication cannot be prescribed due to a contraindication or side-effect.
The availability of information in respect of 2005/06 QOF achievement has enabled an analysis of the indicators most likely to be subject to exception reporting. It has provided an indication of the variations in exception rates that are found between specific indicators, and between NHS organisational areas.
- The overall effective exception rate for England was 5.55 per cent.
- There is variation in exception rates across indicators. In general, the lowest exception rates relate to indicators that measure a process, and the highest exception rates relate to indicators that measure outcomes.
- At practice level 444 practices (5.4 per cent) had overall exception rates higher than 10 per cent.