Skip to main content

Publication, Part of

Adult Social Care Activity and Finance Report, England, 2021-22

National statistics, Official statistics

National Statistics

ASC-FR RO3 reconciliation exercise with DLUHC

A piece of work was conducted in partnership with DLUHC to reconcile the difference between ASC-FR and RO3 net current expenditure.  Local authorities were contacted and asked to provide comments on why net current expenditure differed in the two returns. The comments have been categorised in the Data Quality Summary excel tables.

23 January 2023 11:15 AM

2016-17 update to cash and real term NCE and GCE figures

Table 4 of the Net Current Expenditure and Gross Current Expenditure Tables the cash and real term figures for 2016-17 have been corrected. The correction has also taken place in the chart - Figure 3 Cash vs Real term

16 February 2024 14:40 PM

Activity and Finance Overview

The following table shows reporting measures and year on year changes. Many of the year on year changes are likely to be influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic continuing to have an impact in 2021-22.

Table 1: Reporting measures with year-on-year change, 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22


Source: ASC-FR and SALT Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Tables 1, 2, 3, 15, 29 and 33 in Data Tables.

 

Local authorities received 1,978,550 requests for support from new clients in 2021-22, an increase of 9.3% since 2015-16. Note: as 2014-15 was the first year of the SALT data collection, and due to a number of data quality issues, councils were provided with the opportunity to revise their 2014-15 data; this was published alongside the 2015-16 collection however only some of the councils who would have liked to review the data had the technology and resources to do so. As such, when considering time series trends in the Activity data, we have used 2015-16 as our starting point.

The total number of completed episodes of short term care to maximise independence (ST-Max) for both new and existing clients, where an outcome had been determined within the reporting period was 252,150. 87.1% (219,580) of these completed episodes were for clients aged 65 and over. Short term support to maximise independence is terminology introduced in the Adult Social Care Data Dictionary to describe a range of services that are of short duration (typically being provided for a few weeks) and that have the explicit aim of trying to minimise the person’s use of ongoing social care services.

Overall, the number of clients receiving long term care during the year has decreased since 2015-16, to 817,915 in 2021-22. This has been mainly driven by clients aged 65 and over receiving long term care, with numbers down 58,485 to 529,010 since 2015-16. However, the number of clients aged 18-64 receiving long term care has increased slightly over the period, increasing by 3,880 to 288,905 since 2015-16.

Since last year there has been a decrease in the number of clients in long term care during the year, down 23,325 (2.8%). This decrease is driven by those aged 65 and over which accounts for 96.6% of the drop. Some local authorities told us this was influenced by; a reduction in availability or capacity of services, services paused or closed, and staff shortages over the reporting period. More detail can be found in the long term care section of this report.

Gross current expenditure on adult social care by local authorities was £22.0 billion. This represents an increase of £0.7 billion (3.4%) from the previous year. Local authorities reported income from specific and special grants of £1.5 billion in 2019-20, this increased to £3.0 billion in 2020-21 and has remained at £3.0 billion in 2021-22 due to COVID-19 funding e.g. Infection Control Fund, Workforce Capacity Fund being reported and recognised as Specific and Special Grants in ASC-FR.

The csv files accompanying this report provide a full breakdown of all expenditure and activity figures provided by local authorities as part of the ASC-FR collection.

Figure 1: Overview of adult social care activity provided or organised by local authorities, 2021-22

Source: SALT Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Table 9, 21, and 34 in Data Tables. Please note: the breakdowns on long term and short term support include all support, not just those with the relevant sequel following a request. The long term support figures in the diagram above relate to all those receiving care at some point in the year.


Total expenditure on adult social care by local authorities in 2021-22 was £26.9 billion (up £0.9 billion since 2020-21, a 3.3% uplift), however this includes capital charges and some of this expenditure is offset by income from other sources such as the NHS. A full breakdown of how total expenditure is split between local authority spend and income from other sources can be found in Table 3.

In 2021-22 gross current expenditure on adult social care (which accounts for spending by social care departments and also includes client contributions), was £22.0 billion, and this is the measure of expenditure used throughout this report (except where otherwise stated).

Why do we use gross current expenditure?

Gross current expenditure covers the amount of spend by local authorities that is not offset by income from clients and does not include a capital charge. It is the fiscal metric used to denote local government spending, so unless otherwise stated gross current expenditure is used as the main source for figures in this report.

It is important to be aware of the constituent parts that contribute to calculating gross current expenditure, as shown in Figure 2, as any year on year changes to gross current expenditure will be driven by increases or decreases in one or more of these areas.

Figure 2: How gross current expenditure is calculated, 2021-22

Source: ASC-FR Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Table 3 in Data Tables. The sizes of the images are indicative and are not to scale.

Cash Terms versus Real Terms

A comparison in cash terms compares corresponding values between years, without any form of adjustment. A comparison in real terms accounts for the effect of inflation between figures, and so allows for the comparison of corresponding values, whilst controlling for any changes in the value of the pound.

More information on the process of obtaining these adjusted figures using Gross Domestic Product (GDP) deflators is available in Appendix A.


Gross current expenditure has increased £0.7 billion since 2020-21, which is a 3.4% increase in cash terms and a 3.9% increase in real terms. As shown in Figure 3, this is the sixth consecutive year gross current expenditure in real terms has increased since the last increase in 2009-10.

When looking at changes in monetary amounts over time it can be difficult to see whether more or less money has been spent as the real change is often masked by the effects of inflation. Therefore, it is useful to strip out the effects of inflation so the real change in expenditure can be examined.

Up until 2020-21 real terms was greater than cash terms. However, last year for the first time cash terms was greater. For examples of comparative spend in 2008-09 and last year please see Appendix A.


Source: ASC-FR Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Table 4 in Data Tables, and ONS deflators found here https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gdp-deflators-at-market-prices-and-money-gdp-september-2022-quarterly-national-accounts


In additional to the usual funding of adult social care through council tax and grants from central government (such as improved Better Care Fund), local authorities have been able to use an adult social care precept to raise additional funds.

Local authorities with adult social care responsibilities have been able to increase council tax by up to an additional 3% over 2021-22 and 2022-23. Local authorities could decide to utilise all 3% in 2021-22, split it over the two years or use it all in 2022-23. This is in addition to the usual funding of adult social care through council tax. This precept applies to London boroughs (including the City of London), county councils, metropolitan districts, and unitary authorities.

  • The additional adult social care precept flexibility in 2021-22 generated £610 million.
  • Of 152 authorities with adult social care responsibilities, 148 utilised some, or all, of their precept flexibility for 2021-22. Of these, 100 authorities utilised the full 3%.

Figure 4 below provides a summary of gross current expenditure on adult social care and how this expenditure is allocated.

The table below shows total gross current expenditure and its constituent parts compared to last year. As a whole, gross current expenditure has risen by 3.4%, with increases in both long and short term support. Other GCE has decreased this year but still remains considerably higher than 2019-20 as much of the COVID-19 funding e.g. Infection Control Fund, Workforce Capacity Fund, was to support the sector rather than supporting the care of individuals so guidance continues to report this as Commissioning and Service Delivery costs.

Table 2: Gross current expenditure, by care type, 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22

Source: ASC-FR Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Table 15 in Data Tables.

 

Figure 4: Overview of gross current expenditure on adult social care, 2021-22

Source: ASC-FR Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Table 14, 19, 20 and 46 in Data Tables. Numbers may not add up due to rounding.


Public spending on adult social care

Users of this report may be interested in the overall estimate of public spending on adult social care, which consists of the net current expenditure (local authority spend) plus planned spending on the minimum Better Care Fund for social care or direct with social care providers, to give a total of £21.4 billion in 2021-22. A full time series of the estimated public spend on adult social care can be found in the table below.

Table 3: Net current expenditure on adult social care services in cash terms, by source of funding, 2009-10 to 2021-22


Net current expenditure is total expenditure excluding capital charges and less all income. Full details of the sources of these data can be found in Appendix B.

Why might you use net current expenditure?

Net current expenditure is useful for understanding how much of adult social care is funded from local authority monies – be they raised locally such as council tax (including the adult social care precept), business rates, etc, or where they are centrally funded such as the improved Better Care Fund or the local government finance settlement.

Net current expenditure removes capital charges and external income and is thus not impacted by changes in client contributions and income from the NHS, the two largest income components.


For users specifically interested in this metric, an additional set of Net Current Expenditure Data Tables based on data collected in the ASC-FR are available.

Net current expenditure on Adult Social Care is also collected by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities as part of the Local Government Revenue Outturn (RO) returns, and published here: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/local-authority-revenue-expenditure-and-financing

Additional categories were introduced into RO3 in 2020-21 to capture COVID-19 discharge costs, disbursement payments to care providers and other payments to care providers – although these categories have not been added to the ASC-FR data collection these costs should be included for completeness, and net current expenditure totals in both collections are still expected to reconcile.

 


Income – how is social care funded?

Of the £26.9 billion total expenditure in 2021-22, 70.5% (£18.9 billion) is funded directly by the local authority (this includes capital charges and is known as net total expenditure, as seen in Figure 7 below). This represents a 2.6% increase (£0.5 billion) from 2021-22.

One area of central funding is the improved Better Care Fund. The value of the iBCF in 2021-22 was £2.1 billion.

What is the Improved Better Care Fund?

The improved Better Care Fund (iBCF) grant was announced in the 2015 Spending Review and was introduced from 2017-18 onwards. The grant provides local government with new funding for adult social care and must be pooled alongside the clinical commissioning group and DFG funding in the BCF. The original funding was increased by £2 billion in total from 2017-18 to 2019-20 in the 2017 March Budget, rising to an annual allocation of £1.837 billion by 2019-20.

In 2020-21, the £240 million winter pressures grant was combined with the iBCF. The value of the iBCF in 2020-21 was £2.077 billion.

The fund is paid directly to local government and must be used to support social care activity.

Source: NHS England

 

The Spending Review 2020 confirmed that the iBCF grant will continue in 2021-22 and be maintained at its current level (£2.077 billion).

Source: GOV.UK

 

 

Expenditure funded by the improved Better Care Fund and other Specific and Special Grants (such as the Infection Control Fund and the Workforce Capacity Fund) is captured in the data, but those grants are not reported as income in this collection. Figure 5 below shows how income from Specific and Special grants has been increasing over the past six years, especially in 2020-21 and 2021-22 where the funding levels are double that of 2019-20. This jump is due to COVID-19 funding such as the Infection Control Fund, and Workforce Capacity Fund are being reported and recognised as Specific and Special Grants in ASC-FR.

Source: ASC-FR Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital.

 

The remaining 29.5% (£7.9 billion) of total expenditure is funded by income from other sources, which has increased by 5.1% (£0.4 billion) since 2020-21 (as seen in Figure 6 below). Joint arrangements have decreased, while income from the NHS (including the Better Care Fund and recharges for activity funded under COVID-19 hospital discharge arrangements), client contributions and other income have all increased.

This collection cannot be used to consider the financial pressures on local authorities as it does not reflect the full picture on all income streams available to fund social care.

In the 2017-18 adult social care finance return, recording of the income from the Better Care Fund became mandatory. This year local authorities stated they received a combined total of £2.1 billion income from Better Care Fund, which accounted for 52.4% of their Income from NHS. Please note that this relates to actual expenditure reported by local authorities in the ASC-FR return when considering it against the planned minimum Better Care Fund spend for social care or direct with social care providers, reported in Table 3.

What is the Better Care Fund?

The £5.3bn Better Care Fund was announced by the Government in the June 2013 spending round, to ensure a transformation in integrated health and social care. The Better Care Fund (BCF) creates a local single pooled budget to incentivise the NHS and local government to work more closely together around people, placing their wellbeing as the focus of health and care services, and shifting resources into adult social care and community services for the benefit of the people, communities and health and care systems.

Source: https://www.local.gov.uk/our-support/our-improvement-offer/care-and-health-improvement/integration-and-better-care-fund/better-care-fund

 

It should be highlighted that whilst Health and Wellbeing Boards use the Better Care Fund to support integrated health and social care, finance data is available on how local authorities spend this funding but data on the associated activity, or lower-level detail on how this funding is spent is not collected within the NHS Digital returns.

Source: ASC-FR Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Table 6 in Data Tables and previous publications.

 

Figure 7: Overview of total local authority expenditure and income on adult social care, 2021-22

Source: ASC-FR Collection, 2021-22, NHS Digital - See Table 3 in Data Tables. Net estimate of total public spend is based on local authority expenditure plus NHS Better Care Fund spend, some of which is spent directly by the NHS and so would not be included in the ASC-FR return made by local authorities. It is important to note that although the Income from the NHS reported by local authorities in the ASC-FR return does include some Better Care Fund spending, it will also include local arrangements with the NHS. Therefore, the Income from NHS and Better Care Fund figures in the diagram above are related but are not directly comparable.



Last edited: 16 February 2024 2:41 pm