Skip to main content

National Third Molar Audit

This is the first national audit examining the incidence of problems from third molars, the decisions made in treating them and the long-term outcomes of those decisions.

Thank you for your participation. This audit is now closed.

Communication was sent out on 25 April 2018.

If you have any queries please contact  [email protected].

The surgical treatment of the third molar is one of the priority areas identified by The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) for a national audit. Wisdom teeth may erupt normally into correct dental alignment and function. Sometimes they develop in non-functional or minimally functional positions. Impaction occurs when there is prevention of complete eruption due to lack of space, obstruction or development in an abnormal position. This may result in a tooth erupting partially or not at all. Impaction may be associated with pathological changes including infection in the overlying tissues, an increased risk of caries and periodontal disease in adjacent teeth, and cyst formation. Current best practice according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommends the removal of impacted third molars which have caused these pathological changes.


What does it measure

The audit aimed to determine:

  • the extent of morbidity caused by third molar pathology in the UK
  • whether patients are referred with relevant problems related to their third molars
  • whether patients are offered treatment that is in accordance with relevant guidelines (NICE Technology Appraisal  No 1 - Guidance on the Extraction of Wisdom Teeth, March 2000)
  • whether patients are benefiting from their treatment
  • whether innovative treatments such as coronectomy are safe in the long-term
  • any significant longer-term clinical or economic implications of following the current NICE guidance for third molar treatment

Benefits

This audit recorded patients' symptoms and allow comparison of practice to the current NICE guidelines. It will also assess if the referral letter is an accurate reflection of the symptoms. Using patient-reported outcome measures will help to determine whether the treatment was of benefit and will record any treatment- related problems. Ultimately, higher case submission rates will lead to a more comprehensive picture of patient care and help improve patient care in the future.

The audit's long-term objectives were

  • to support clinicians in satisfying revalidation requirements relating to participation in clinical audit and improvement activity
  • to ensure that surgery resolves the patients' problems with minimal morbidity
  • to provide clinically meaningful information for comparative purposes and to help explain variations
  • to confirm best practice and provide an opportunity to share this
  • to provide a basis for the development of local action plans

Who managed the audit

The project was instigated by the Council of BAOMS and been developed and approved by its clinical effectiveness sub-committee. It was funded by Saving Faces, The Facial Surgery Research Foundation and co-ordinated by the National Facial and Oral Research Centre (NFORC), a branch of Saving Faces. NHS Digital is providing the IT infrastructure and data management support.


Get in touch

If you have a clinical question or a general query about the audit, please contact NFORC on 020 8223 8049 or [email protected]

Last edited: 21 September 2023 12:13 pm